Salary comparison
Amusement and Recreation Attendants: Seattle vs Napa
Seattle, WA pays about 4.0% more for amusement and recreation attendants on paper — $39,330 vs $37,820. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Seattle comes out ahead by $1,510 a year in real buying power.
Seattle, WA
$39,330
$37,610
$44,700
$18.91
100
$39,330/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Napa, CA
$37,820
$36,090
$40,960
$18.19
100
$37,820/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $1,510 a year (4.0%) in favor of Seattle. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Seattle runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Napa sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Seattle is the better deal by $1,510 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Napa to Seattle for this role, the raise needs to beat 4.0% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do amusement and recreation attendants earn more, Seattle or Napa?
Seattle pays $39,330 on median — about 4.0% more than Napa ($37,820). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Seattle. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Seattle gives you roughly$39,330 of real buying power versus $37,820 in the other city.