Salary comparison
Animal Caretakers: Burlington vs Los Angeles
Burlington, VT pays about 7.3% more for animal caretakers on paper — $41,330 vs $38,520. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Burlington comes out ahead by $2,810 a year in real buying power.
Burlington, VT
$41,330
$35,620
$46,350
$19.87
100
$41,330/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Los Angeles, CA
$38,520
$36,770
$43,810
$18.52
100
$38,520/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $2,810 a year (7.3%) in favor of Burlington. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Burlington runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Los Angeles sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Burlington is the better deal by $2,810 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Los Angeles to Burlington for this role, the raise needs to beat 7.3% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do animal caretakers earn more, Burlington or Los Angeles?
Burlington pays $41,330 on median — about 7.3% more than Los Angeles ($38,520). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Burlington. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Burlington gives you roughly$41,330 of real buying power versus $38,520 in the other city.