Salary comparison
Construction Laborers: Minneapolis vs Springfield
Springfield, MA pays about 1.1% more for construction laborers on paper — $62,660 vs $61,970. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Springfield comes out ahead by $690 a year in real buying power.
Minneapolis, MN
$61,970
$50,280
$83,490
$29.79
100
$61,970/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Springfield, MA
$62,660
$48,740
$77,090
$30.12
100
$62,660/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $690 a year (1.1%) in favor of Springfield. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Minneapolis runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Springfield sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Springfield is the better deal by $690 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Minneapolis to Springfield for this role, the raise needs to beat 1.1% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do construction laborers earn more, Minneapolis or Springfield?
Springfield pays $62,660 on median — about 1.1% more than Minneapolis ($61,970). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Springfield. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Springfield gives you roughly$62,660 of real buying power versus $61,970 in the other city.