Salary comparison
Construction Managers: Bellingham vs Worcester
Bellingham, WA pays about 11.4% more for construction managers on paper — $156,580 vs $140,570. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Bellingham comes out ahead by $16,010 a year in real buying power.
Bellingham, WA
$156,580
$131,270
$176,500
$75.28
100
$156,580/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Worcester, MA
$140,570
$122,470
$164,900
$67.58
100
$140,570/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $16,010 a year (11.4%) in favor of Bellingham. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Bellingham runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Worcester sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Bellingham is the better deal by $16,010 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Worcester to Bellingham for this role, the raise needs to beat 11.4% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do construction managers earn more, Bellingham or Worcester?
Bellingham pays $156,580 on median — about 11.4% more than Worcester ($140,570). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Bellingham. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Bellingham gives you roughly$156,580 of real buying power versus $140,570 in the other city.