Salary comparison
Cost Estimators: Boston vs Worcester
Boston, MA pays about 10.9% more for cost estimators on paper — $102,640 vs $92,570. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Boston comes out ahead by $10,070 a year in real buying power.
Boston, MA
$102,640
$77,980
$129,530
$49.35
100
$102,640/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Worcester, MA
$92,570
$64,670
$117,820
$44.50
100
$92,570/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $10,070 a year (10.9%) in favor of Boston. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Boston runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Worcester sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Boston is the better deal by $10,070 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Worcester to Boston for this role, the raise needs to beat 10.9% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do cost estimators earn more, Boston or Worcester?
Boston pays $102,640 on median — about 10.9% more than Worcester ($92,570). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Boston. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Boston gives you roughly$102,640 of real buying power versus $92,570 in the other city.