Salary comparison
Facilities Managers: Kennewick vs San Jose
Kennewick, WA pays about 8.4% more for facilities managers on paper — $157,120 vs $145,000. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Kennewick comes out ahead by $12,120 a year in real buying power.
Kennewick, WA
$157,120
$105,200
$211,200
$75.54
100
$157,120/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
San Jose, CA
$145,000
$110,000
$185,960
$69.71
100
$145,000/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $12,120 a year (8.4%) in favor of Kennewick. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Kennewick runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; San Jose sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Kennewick is the better deal by $12,120 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from San Jose to Kennewick for this role, the raise needs to beat 8.4% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do facilities managers earn more, Kennewick or San Jose?
Kennewick pays $157,120 on median — about 8.4% more than San Jose ($145,000). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Kennewick. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Kennewick gives you roughly$157,120 of real buying power versus $145,000 in the other city.