Salary comparison
Facilities Managers: San Jose vs Seattle
Seattle, WA pays about 3.1% more for facilities managers on paper — $149,490 vs $145,000. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Seattle comes out ahead by $4,490 a year in real buying power.
San Jose, CA
$145,000
$110,000
$185,960
$69.71
100
$145,000/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Seattle, WA
$149,490
$121,700
$166,040
$71.87
100
$149,490/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $4,490 a year (3.1%) in favor of Seattle. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
San Jose runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Seattle sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Seattle is the better deal by $4,490 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from San Jose to Seattle for this role, the raise needs to beat 3.1% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do facilities managers earn more, San Jose or Seattle?
Seattle pays $149,490 on median — about 3.1% more than San Jose ($145,000). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Seattle. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Seattle gives you roughly$149,490 of real buying power versus $145,000 in the other city.