Salary comparison
Financial Managers: Denver vs Seattle
Denver, CO pays about 4.2% more for financial managers on paper — $193,400 vs $185,550. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Denver comes out ahead by $7,850 a year in real buying power.
Denver, CO
$193,400
$157,370
$249,360
$92.98
100
$193,400/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Seattle, WA
$185,550
$149,530
$228,360
$89.21
100
$185,550/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $7,850 a year (4.2%) in favor of Denver. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Denver runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Seattle sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Denver is the better deal by $7,850 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Seattle to Denver for this role, the raise needs to beat 4.2% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do financial managers earn more, Denver or Seattle?
Denver pays $193,400 on median — about 4.2% more than Seattle ($185,550). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Denver. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Denver gives you roughly$193,400 of real buying power versus $185,550 in the other city.