Salary comparison
Financial Managers: San Jose vs Denver
San Jose, CA pays about 16.5% more for financial managers on paper — $225,280 vs $193,400. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, San Jose comes out ahead by $31,880 a year in real buying power.
San Jose, CA
$225,280
$176,900
$327,840
$108.31
100
$225,280/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Denver, CO
$193,400
$157,370
$249,360
$92.98
100
$193,400/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $31,880 a year (16.5%) in favor of San Jose. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
San Jose runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Denver sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, San Jose is the better deal by $31,880 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Denver to San Jose for this role, the raise needs to beat 16.5% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do financial managers earn more, San Jose or Denver?
San Jose pays $225,280 on median — about 16.5% more than Denver ($193,400). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
San Jose. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, San Jose gives you roughly$225,280 of real buying power versus $193,400 in the other city.