Salary comparison
First-Line Supervisors of Production and Operating Workers: San Francisco vs Spartanburg
Spartanburg, SC pays about 0.6% more for first-line supervisors of production and operating workers on paper — $92,070 vs $91,500. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Spartanburg comes out ahead by $570 a year in real buying power.
San Francisco, CA
$91,500
$67,650
$113,730
$43.99
100
$91,500/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Spartanburg, SC
$92,070
$71,270
$92,070
$44.26
100
$92,070/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $570 a year (0.6%) in favor of Spartanburg. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
San Francisco runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Spartanburg sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Spartanburg is the better deal by $570 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from San Francisco to Spartanburg for this role, the raise needs to beat 0.6% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do first-line supervisors of production and operating workers earn more, San Francisco or Spartanburg?
Spartanburg pays $92,070 on median — about 0.6% more than San Francisco ($91,500). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Spartanburg. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Spartanburg gives you roughly$92,070 of real buying power versus $91,500 in the other city.