Salary comparison
General and Operations Managers: Boulder vs Sioux Falls
Boulder, CO pays about 6.6% more for general and operations managers on paper — $152,100 vs $142,730. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Boulder comes out ahead by $9,370 a year in real buying power.
Boulder, CO
$152,100
$99,700
$226,850
$73.13
100
$152,100/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Sioux Falls, SD
$142,730
$104,570
$194,500
$68.62
100
$142,730/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $9,370 a year (6.6%) in favor of Boulder. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Boulder runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Sioux Falls sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Boulder is the better deal by $9,370 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Sioux Falls to Boulder for this role, the raise needs to beat 6.6% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do general and operations managers earn more, Boulder or Sioux Falls?
Boulder pays $152,100 on median — about 6.6% more than Sioux Falls ($142,730). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Boulder. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Boulder gives you roughly$152,100 of real buying power versus $142,730 in the other city.