LSLocalSalaryHub

Salary comparison

General and Operations Managers: Washington vs Waterbury

Washington, DC pays about 19.5% more for general and operations managers on paper — $156,460 vs $130,900. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Washington comes out ahead by $25,560 a year in real buying power.

Washington, DC

Median salary

$156,460

25th percentile

$99,840

75th percentile

$201,010

Hourly

$75.22

Cost index

100

Real buying power

$156,460/yr

Median adjusted for local cost of living.

Full Washington salary page

Waterbury, CT

Median salary

$130,900

25th percentile

$93,590

75th percentile

$198,100

Hourly

$62.93

Cost index

100

Real buying power

$130,900/yr

Median adjusted for local cost of living.

Full Waterbury salary page

What the numbers mean in practice

The headline gap is $25,560 a year (19.5%) in favor of Washington. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.

Washington runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Waterbury sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Washington is the better deal by $25,560 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.

If you are weighing a move from Waterbury to Washington for this role, the raise needs to beat 19.5% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.

Common questions

Where do general and operations managers earn more, Washington or Waterbury?

Washington pays $156,460 on median — about 19.5% more than Waterbury ($130,900). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.

Which city is the better deal after living costs?

Washington. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Washington gives you roughly$156,460 of real buying power versus $130,900 in the other city.

All General and Operations Managers salaries nationwide →