Salary comparison
Human Resources Specialists: Rochester vs San Francisco
San Francisco, CA pays about 23.1% more for human resources specialists on paper — $103,140 vs $83,810. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, San Francisco comes out ahead by $19,330 a year in real buying power.
Rochester, MN
$83,810
$69,000
$106,330
$40.30
100
$83,810/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
San Francisco, CA
$103,140
$79,820
$136,040
$49.59
100
$103,140/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $19,330 a year (23.1%) in favor of San Francisco. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Rochester runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; San Francisco sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, San Francisco is the better deal by $19,330 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Rochester to San Francisco for this role, the raise needs to beat 23.1% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do human resources specialists earn more, Rochester or San Francisco?
San Francisco pays $103,140 on median — about 23.1% more than Rochester ($83,810). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
San Francisco. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, San Francisco gives you roughly$103,140 of real buying power versus $83,810 in the other city.