Salary comparison
Industrial Production Managers: Lexington Park vs San Francisco
Lexington Park, MD pays about 1.6% more for industrial production managers on paper — $167,040 vs $164,420. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Lexington Park comes out ahead by $2,620 a year in real buying power.
Lexington Park, MD
$167,040
$132,110
$202,280
$80.31
100
$167,040/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
San Francisco, CA
$164,420
$128,070
$208,050
$79.05
100
$164,420/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $2,620 a year (1.6%) in favor of Lexington Park. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Lexington Park runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; San Francisco sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Lexington Park is the better deal by $2,620 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from San Francisco to Lexington Park for this role, the raise needs to beat 1.6% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do industrial production managers earn more, Lexington Park or San Francisco?
Lexington Park pays $167,040 on median — about 1.6% more than San Francisco ($164,420). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Lexington Park. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Lexington Park gives you roughly$167,040 of real buying power versus $164,420 in the other city.