Salary comparison
Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, and Weighers: Bismarck vs Flagstaff
Flagstaff, AZ pays about 3.0% more for inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers, and weighers on paper — $65,840 vs $63,910. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Flagstaff comes out ahead by $1,930 a year in real buying power.
Bismarck, ND
$63,910
$49,420
$68,680
$30.73
100
$63,910/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Flagstaff, AZ
$65,840
$47,260
$68,510
$31.65
100
$65,840/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $1,930 a year (3.0%) in favor of Flagstaff. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Bismarck runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Flagstaff sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Flagstaff is the better deal by $1,930 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Bismarck to Flagstaff for this role, the raise needs to beat 3.0% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers, and weighers earn more, Bismarck or Flagstaff?
Flagstaff pays $65,840 on median — about 3.0% more than Bismarck ($63,910). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Flagstaff. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Flagstaff gives you roughly$65,840 of real buying power versus $63,910 in the other city.