LSLocalSalaryHub

Salary comparison

Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses: San Jose vs Mount Vernon

San Jose, CA pays about 13.6% more for licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses on paper — $95,320 vs $83,940. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, San Jose comes out ahead by $11,380 a year in real buying power.

San Jose, CA

Median salary

$95,320

25th percentile

$84,000

75th percentile

$100,950

Hourly

$45.83

Cost index

100

Real buying power

$95,320/yr

Median adjusted for local cost of living.

Full San Jose salary page

Mount Vernon, WA

Median salary

$83,940

25th percentile

$73,650

75th percentile

$97,280

Hourly

$40.36

Cost index

100

Real buying power

$83,940/yr

Median adjusted for local cost of living.

Full Mount Vernon salary page

What the numbers mean in practice

The headline gap is $11,380 a year (13.6%) in favor of San Jose. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.

San Jose runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Mount Vernon sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, San Jose is the better deal by $11,380 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.

If you are weighing a move from Mount Vernon to San Jose for this role, the raise needs to beat 13.6% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.

Common questions

Where do licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses earn more, San Jose or Mount Vernon?

San Jose pays $95,320 on median — about 13.6% more than Mount Vernon ($83,940). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.

Which city is the better deal after living costs?

San Jose. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, San Jose gives you roughly$95,320 of real buying power versus $83,940 in the other city.

All Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses salaries nationwide →