LSLocalSalaryHub

Salary comparison

Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses: Santa Rosa vs Seattle

Santa Rosa, CA pays about 8.0% more for licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses on paper — $92,580 vs $85,690. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Santa Rosa comes out ahead by $6,890 a year in real buying power.

Santa Rosa, CA

Median salary

$92,580

25th percentile

$78,930

75th percentile

$99,830

Hourly

$44.51

Cost index

100

Real buying power

$92,580/yr

Median adjusted for local cost of living.

Full Santa Rosa salary page

Seattle, WA

Median salary

$85,690

25th percentile

$80,560

75th percentile

$96,620

Hourly

$41.20

Cost index

100

Real buying power

$85,690/yr

Median adjusted for local cost of living.

Full Seattle salary page

What the numbers mean in practice

The headline gap is $6,890 a year (8.0%) in favor of Santa Rosa. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.

Santa Rosa runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Seattle sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Santa Rosa is the better deal by $6,890 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.

If you are weighing a move from Seattle to Santa Rosa for this role, the raise needs to beat 8.0% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.

Common questions

Where do licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses earn more, Santa Rosa or Seattle?

Santa Rosa pays $92,580 on median — about 8.0% more than Seattle ($85,690). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.

Which city is the better deal after living costs?

Santa Rosa. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Santa Rosa gives you roughly$92,580 of real buying power versus $85,690 in the other city.

All Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses salaries nationwide →