Salary comparison
Medical and Health Services Managers: Mount Vernon vs Sacramento
Sacramento, CA pays about 13.0% more for medical and health services managers on paper — $159,350 vs $141,030. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Sacramento comes out ahead by $18,320 a year in real buying power.
Mount Vernon, WA
$141,030
$113,570
$175,430
$67.80
100
$141,030/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Sacramento, CA
$159,350
$101,140
$215,450
$76.61
100
$159,350/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $18,320 a year (13.0%) in favor of Sacramento. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Mount Vernon runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Sacramento sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Sacramento is the better deal by $18,320 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Mount Vernon to Sacramento for this role, the raise needs to beat 13.0% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do medical and health services managers earn more, Mount Vernon or Sacramento?
Sacramento pays $159,350 on median — about 13.0% more than Mount Vernon ($141,030). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Sacramento. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Sacramento gives you roughly$159,350 of real buying power versus $141,030 in the other city.