Salary comparison
Pharmacists: Napa vs San Francisco
Napa, CA pays about 13.1% more for pharmacists on paper — $200,580 vs $177,410. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Napa comes out ahead by $23,170 a year in real buying power.
Napa, CA
$200,580
$169,160
$217,380
$96.43
100
$200,580/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
San Francisco, CA
$177,410
$164,560
$220,120
$85.29
100
$177,410/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $23,170 a year (13.1%) in favor of Napa. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Napa runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; San Francisco sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Napa is the better deal by $23,170 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from San Francisco to Napa for this role, the raise needs to beat 13.1% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do pharmacists earn more, Napa or San Francisco?
Napa pays $200,580 on median — about 13.1% more than San Francisco ($177,410). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Napa. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Napa gives you roughly$200,580 of real buying power versus $177,410 in the other city.