Salary comparison
Pharmacists: Sacramento vs Walla Walla
Sacramento, CA pays about 4.5% more for pharmacists on paper — $172,680 vs $165,210. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Sacramento comes out ahead by $7,470 a year in real buying power.
Sacramento, CA
$172,680
$156,420
$202,560
$83.02
100
$172,680/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Walla Walla, WA
$165,210
$136,590
$171,540
$79.43
100
$165,210/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $7,470 a year (4.5%) in favor of Sacramento. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Sacramento runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Walla Walla sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Sacramento is the better deal by $7,470 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Walla Walla to Sacramento for this role, the raise needs to beat 4.5% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do pharmacists earn more, Sacramento or Walla Walla?
Sacramento pays $172,680 on median — about 4.5% more than Walla Walla ($165,210). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Sacramento. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Sacramento gives you roughly$172,680 of real buying power versus $165,210 in the other city.