Salary comparison
Pharmacists: Santa Rosa vs Walla Walla
Santa Rosa, CA pays about 3.2% more for pharmacists on paper — $170,570 vs $165,210. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Santa Rosa comes out ahead by $5,360 a year in real buying power.
Santa Rosa, CA
$170,570
$159,800
$210,760
$82.00
100
$170,570/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Walla Walla, WA
$165,210
$136,590
$171,540
$79.43
100
$165,210/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $5,360 a year (3.2%) in favor of Santa Rosa. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Santa Rosa runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Walla Walla sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Santa Rosa is the better deal by $5,360 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Walla Walla to Santa Rosa for this role, the raise needs to beat 3.2% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do pharmacists earn more, Santa Rosa or Walla Walla?
Santa Rosa pays $170,570 on median — about 3.2% more than Walla Walla ($165,210). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Santa Rosa. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Santa Rosa gives you roughly$170,570 of real buying power versus $165,210 in the other city.