Salary comparison
Recreation Workers: Bellingham vs Napa
Bellingham, WA pays about 4.6% more for recreation workers on paper — $44,640 vs $42,670. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Bellingham comes out ahead by $1,970 a year in real buying power.
Bellingham, WA
$44,640
$39,780
$47,770
$21.46
100
$44,640/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Napa, CA
$42,670
$39,400
$48,680
$20.51
100
$42,670/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $1,970 a year (4.6%) in favor of Bellingham. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Bellingham runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Napa sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Bellingham is the better deal by $1,970 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Napa to Bellingham for this role, the raise needs to beat 4.6% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do recreation workers earn more, Bellingham or Napa?
Bellingham pays $44,640 on median — about 4.6% more than Napa ($42,670). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Bellingham. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Bellingham gives you roughly$44,640 of real buying power versus $42,670 in the other city.