Salary comparison
Recreation Workers: Mount Vernon vs San Jose
San Jose, CA pays about 32.7% more for recreation workers on paper — $57,580 vs $43,380. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, San Jose comes out ahead by $14,200 a year in real buying power.
Mount Vernon, WA
$43,380
$36,290
$45,700
$20.86
100
$43,380/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
San Jose, CA
$57,580
$44,830
$61,520
$27.68
100
$57,580/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $14,200 a year (32.7%) in favor of San Jose. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Mount Vernon runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; San Jose sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, San Jose is the better deal by $14,200 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Mount Vernon to San Jose for this role, the raise needs to beat 32.7% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do recreation workers earn more, Mount Vernon or San Jose?
San Jose pays $57,580 on median — about 32.7% more than Mount Vernon ($43,380). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
San Jose. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, San Jose gives you roughly$57,580 of real buying power versus $43,380 in the other city.