Salary comparison
Recreation Workers: San Jose vs Walla Walla
San Jose, CA pays about 43.1% more for recreation workers on paper — $57,580 vs $40,250. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, San Jose comes out ahead by $17,330 a year in real buying power.
San Jose, CA
$57,580
$44,830
$61,520
$27.68
100
$57,580/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Walla Walla, WA
$40,250
$36,130
$49,710
$19.35
100
$40,250/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $17,330 a year (43.1%) in favor of San Jose. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
San Jose runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Walla Walla sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, San Jose is the better deal by $17,330 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Walla Walla to San Jose for this role, the raise needs to beat 43.1% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do recreation workers earn more, San Jose or Walla Walla?
San Jose pays $57,580 on median — about 43.1% more than Walla Walla ($40,250). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
San Jose. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, San Jose gives you roughly$57,580 of real buying power versus $40,250 in the other city.