Salary comparison
Sales Representatives of Services, Except Advertising, Insurance, Financial Services, and Travel: Boston vs Los Angeles
Boston, MA pays about 5.0% more for sales representatives of services, except advertising, insurance, financial services, and travel on paper — $83,420 vs $79,450. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Boston comes out ahead by $3,970 a year in real buying power.
Boston, MA
$83,420
$63,420
$124,180
$40.11
100
$83,420/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Los Angeles, CA
$79,450
$52,250
$104,230
$38.20
100
$79,450/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $3,970 a year (5.0%) in favor of Boston. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Boston runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Los Angeles sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Boston is the better deal by $3,970 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Los Angeles to Boston for this role, the raise needs to beat 5.0% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do sales representatives of services, except advertising, insurance, financial services, and travel earn more, Boston or Los Angeles?
Boston pays $83,420 on median — about 5.0% more than Los Angeles ($79,450). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Boston. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Boston gives you roughly$83,420 of real buying power versus $79,450 in the other city.