Salary comparison
Sales Representatives of Services, Except Advertising, Insurance, Financial Services, and Travel: Pittsfield vs Seattle
Seattle, WA pays about 3.8% more for sales representatives of services, except advertising, insurance, financial services, and travel on paper — $82,540 vs $79,530. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Seattle comes out ahead by $3,010 a year in real buying power.
Pittsfield, MA
$79,530
$55,790
$125,000
$38.23
100
$79,530/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Seattle, WA
$82,540
$65,820
$113,010
$39.68
100
$82,540/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $3,010 a year (3.8%) in favor of Seattle. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Pittsfield runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Seattle sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Seattle is the better deal by $3,010 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Pittsfield to Seattle for this role, the raise needs to beat 3.8% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do sales representatives of services, except advertising, insurance, financial services, and travel earn more, Pittsfield or Seattle?
Seattle pays $82,540 on median — about 3.8% more than Pittsfield ($79,530). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Seattle. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Seattle gives you roughly$82,540 of real buying power versus $79,530 in the other city.