Salary comparison
Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing, Except Technical and Scientific Products: San Francisco vs Sioux Falls
San Francisco, CA pays about 18.2% more for sales representatives, wholesale and manufacturing, except technical and scientific products on paper — $93,100 vs $78,740. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, San Francisco comes out ahead by $14,360 a year in real buying power.
San Francisco, CA
$93,100
$63,250
$127,180
$44.76
100
$93,100/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Sioux Falls, SD
$78,740
$61,630
$97,290
$37.85
100
$78,740/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $14,360 a year (18.2%) in favor of San Francisco. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
San Francisco runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Sioux Falls sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, San Francisco is the better deal by $14,360 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Sioux Falls to San Francisco for this role, the raise needs to beat 18.2% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do sales representatives, wholesale and manufacturing, except technical and scientific products earn more, San Francisco or Sioux Falls?
San Francisco pays $93,100 on median — about 18.2% more than Sioux Falls ($78,740). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
San Francisco. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, San Francisco gives you roughly$93,100 of real buying power versus $78,740 in the other city.