Salary comparison
Security Guards: Walla Walla vs Rochester
Walla Walla, WA pays about 2.1% more for security guards on paper — $48,770 vs $47,790. But once you factor in what it costs to live there, Walla Walla comes out ahead by $980 a year in real buying power.
Walla Walla, WA
$48,770
$37,930
$51,390
$23.45
100
$48,770/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
Rochester, MN
$47,790
$40,240
$55,980
$22.98
100
$47,790/yr
Median adjusted for local cost of living.
What the numbers mean in practice
The headline gap is $980 a year (2.1%) in favor of Walla Walla. That is the raw salary difference before any living costs.
Walla Walla runs a cost index of 100 against the national baseline of 100; Rochester sits at 100. After adjusting the median for those costs, Walla Walla is the better deal by $980 a year — that is what each paycheck actually buys locally.
If you are weighing a move from Rochester to Walla Walla for this role, the raise needs to beat 2.1% to come out ahead after living costs. Anything below that and you are earning more on paper but keeping less.
Common questions
Where do security guards earn more, Walla Walla or Rochester?
Walla Walla pays $48,770 on median — about 2.1% more than Rochester ($47,790). Based on BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Which city is the better deal after living costs?
Walla Walla. Once you divide each median by the local cost index, Walla Walla gives you roughly$48,770 of real buying power versus $47,790 in the other city.